Skip to content
Finzomo

Finzomo · Brochure Making Software

Best Brochure Making Software in 2026

A ranked guide to the best brochure making software for teams that need print-ready and digital brochures without guesswork.

10 tools compared Expert reviewed 6 min read Updated July 5, 2026

The verdict

The best brochure making software is Canva, our Best Overall pick for fast template-based brochure creation with brand assets and team editing. Adobe Express is the runner-up for Adobe-centered teams, and Visme is the top choice for data-rich brochures and reports.

Finzomo ranking of the brochure making software
Sofia Marchetti Written by Sofia Marchetti David Kowalski Fact-checked by David Kowalski
Published July 5, 2026
Last verified July 5, 2026
Table of contents
  1. How we rank these tools
  2. Editor's top 3 picks
  3. Comparison table
  4. 1. Canva
  5. 2. Adobe Express
  6. 3. Visme
  7. 4. Venngage
  8. 5. Marq
  9. 6. Adobe InDesign
  10. 7. Affinity
  11. 8. Piktochart
  12. 9. CorelDRAW Graphics Suite
  13. 10. VistaCreate
  14. Detailed evaluation
  15. What to look for in brochure making software
  16. How brochure making software works
  17. Key trends in brochure design tools
  18. Common mistakes to avoid
  19. Who needs brochure making software
  20. Conclusion
  21. Frequently asked questions

How we rank these tools

1

Field research

We gather input from people who use these tools day to day, then shortlist the products that come up most often.

2

Hands-on testing

Each tool is set up from a clean account and run through a consistent, real-world scenario for the category.

3

Scoring

We score features, ease of use, and value on the same scale so the comparison is fair and repeatable.

4

Editorial review

A separate editor verifies every product detail and figure before the list is published or updated.

Read the full methodology

Brochure making software helps teams design tri-folds, one-pagers, product sheets, event handouts, real estate brochures, school materials, and digital PDFs. The best tools balance template quality, layout control, brand consistency, collaboration, and export options.

This ranking favors tools that non-designers can use without blocking designers who need cleaner typography, image control, and print output. Canva ranks first because it gives the broadest group of teams a fast path from draft to shareable or print-ready brochure.

Editor's top 3 picks

1 Best Overall
Canva logo Canva

Best all-around brochure maker for teams without a dedicated designer

2 Runner-up
Adobe Express logo Adobe Express

Best quick brochure maker for Adobe-centered teams

3 Best Value
Visme logo Visme

Best brochure maker for data-rich reports and explainers

Comparison table

All 10 tools at a glance. Scores are out of 10. Select a name to jump to the full review.

Rank Tool Overall
1
Canva logo
Canva

Best all-around brochure maker for teams without a dedicated designer

9.4
2
Adobe Express logo
Adobe Express

Best quick brochure maker for Adobe-centered teams

9.1
3
Visme logo
Visme

Best brochure maker for data-rich reports and explainers

8.8
4
Venngage logo
Venngage

Best for accessible infographic-style brochures

8.6
5
Marq logo
Marq

Best for brand-controlled brochure creation across distributed teams

8.5
6
Adobe InDesign logo
Adobe InDesign

Best for professional print production and complex page layout

8.3
7
Affinity logo
Affinity

Best desktop design suite for layout, photo, and vector work in one app

8.1
8
Piktochart logo
Piktochart

Best for informational brochures with charts, maps, and structured visuals

7.9
9
CorelDRAW Graphics Suite logo
CorelDRAW Graphics Suite

Best for vector-heavy brochure layouts and print shop workflows

7.7
10
VistaCreate logo
VistaCreate

Best for simple brochures tied to social and web graphics

7.5
Canva logo

1. Canva

Best all-around brochure maker for teams without a dedicated designer

Features 9.5 Ease of use 9.6 Value 9.2 Overall 9.4
Best Overall

Canva is the strongest overall brochure maker because it gets teams from blank page to usable brochure quickly. Its template library covers tri-folds, product brochures, school handouts, real estate materials, menus, and event collateral.

The editor is easy for non-designers, with drag-and-drop layout editing, shared brand assets, comments, and export options for print and digital sharing. Designers may want finer layout control, but most teams will finish good brochures faster in Canva than in a desktop publishing app.

Pros

  • Large brochure template library across business, education, nonprofit, and event use cases
  • Simple editor that non-designers can learn quickly
  • Brand assets, shared folders, comments, and team editing support repeatable work
  • Exports support both print handoff and digital distribution

Cons

  • Precise layout control is thinner than professional page layout software
  • Common templates can feel familiar if teams do not customize them
  • Complex print production work may need a specialist tool
Best for
Small businesses, marketers, schools, nonprofits, and teams that need polished brochures without a designer on every project
Standout feature
Large brochure template library with team editing and brand assets
Use cases
Tri-fold brochures and sales handouts, Event, school, and nonprofit brochures
Visit Canva
Adobe Express logo

2. Adobe Express

Best quick brochure maker for Adobe-centered teams

Features 9.1 Ease of use 9.3 Value 8.9 Overall 9.1
Runner-up

Adobe Express is a strong browser-based brochure maker for teams that already work with Adobe files, assets, and brand systems. It supports templates, PDF import, Adobe Stock assets, brand styling, charts, and real-time sharing.

It is not a replacement for InDesign when a brochure needs strict print production control. Its strength is speed, especially when a team wants branded marketing materials without opening a full desktop layout app.

Pros

  • PDF import helps teams revise and repurpose existing brochure files
  • Adobe asset access fits creative teams already using Adobe workflows
  • Brand styling and sharing tools support quick review cycles
  • Good fit for simple branded brochures, flyers, and social extensions

Cons

  • Less layout depth than Adobe InDesign
  • Some users report slow performance on heavier projects
  • Customization can feel limited for detailed brochure systems
Best for
Adobe users who need quick branded brochures without moving into a full production layout workflow
Standout feature
PDF import with Adobe asset access inside a quick design editor
Use cases
Branded sales brochures, Simple brochure updates from existing PDFs
Visit Adobe Express
Visme logo

3. Visme

Best brochure maker for data-rich reports and explainers

Features 8.9 Ease of use 8.8 Value 8.7 Overall 8.8
Best Value

Visme is strongest when a brochure needs to explain information, not just present a polished cover and contact details. It works well for brochures with charts, reports, process visuals, training content, and B2B explainers.

The editor includes templates, brand tools, charts, and interactive content options. It takes more orientation than the simplest template tools, but it gives content-heavy teams a better structure for turning data and ideas into readable brochures.

Pros

  • Strong chart and data visualization tools for brochure layouts
  • Good fit for reports, explainers, training materials, and education content
  • Brand templates help teams keep recurring documents consistent
  • Interactive content options support digital brochure use

Cons

  • Interface can take time to learn
  • Some graph and formatting controls may feel limited
  • Dense designs can require extra cleanup before export
Best for
B2B teams, educators, trainers, and organizations building brochures around charts, reports, or structured explanations
Standout feature
Chart, data, and interactive content tools inside the brochure workflow
Use cases
Data-rich brochures and visual reports, Training and education handouts
Visit Visme
Venngage logo

4. Venngage

Best for accessible infographic-style brochures

Features 8.7 Ease of use 8.6 Value 8.5 Overall 8.6

Venngage is a template-driven brochure maker with a strong emphasis on visual communication. It is a good fit for teams that combine brochure layouts with charts, maps, icons, and infographic sections.

Its accessibility-focused design checks help teams think about color contrast, hierarchy, and readable layouts. Performance can slow on graphic-heavy projects, but Venngage remains a practical option for public-facing information design.

Pros

  • Good templates for infographic-style brochures and public information materials
  • Charts, maps, and icons fit visual explainers
  • Accessibility checks support more readable brochure design
  • Team comments help review content before publishing

Cons

  • Graphic-heavy designs can slow down
  • Export can take longer on dense projects
  • Less suited to strict professional print production than desktop layout tools
Best for
Nonprofits, healthcare teams, real estate groups, and public communication teams that need accessible visual brochures
Standout feature
Accessibility tools for WCAG-aware brochure design
Use cases
Healthcare and nonprofit information brochures, Real estate and public service explainers
Visit Venngage
Marq logo

5. Marq

Best for brand-controlled brochure creation across distributed teams

Features 8.5 Ease of use 8.5 Value 8.4 Overall 8.5

Marq is built for teams that need many people to create local brochures without breaking brand standards. It combines browser-based editing with lockable templates, asset hubs, roles, and smart fields.

This makes it especially useful for franchises, real estate networks, universities, and field teams. It is less open-ended than a designer-first layout app, but that limitation is part of its purpose, keeping approved brochure systems intact.

Pros

  • Lockable templates protect logos, colors, typography, and approved layouts
  • Smart fields reduce repetitive edits across local brochure versions
  • Asset hubs keep approved images and brand materials organized
  • Good fit for distributed teams with many brochure contributors

Cons

  • Advanced design control is limited compared with desktop layout tools
  • Some users report occasional glitches
  • Template setup requires clear brand governance
Best for
Franchises, real estate networks, universities, and distributed organizations that need controlled local brochure editing
Standout feature
Lockable brand templates that let local teams edit only approved areas
Use cases
Localized branch or franchise brochures, University, real estate, and field-team marketing materials
Visit Marq
Adobe InDesign logo

6. Adobe InDesign

Best for professional print production and complex page layout

Features 8.4 Ease of use 8.1 Value 8.3 Overall 8.3

Adobe InDesign is the specialist pick for serious brochure production. It gives designers detailed control over typography, grids, parent pages, linked assets, preflight, and print-focused PDF output.

It is more demanding than browser-based brochure makers, so it is not the quickest choice for casual users. For agencies, print shops, and in-house designers producing complex multi-page brochures, it remains the benchmark for layout precision.

Pros

  • Excellent typography, grid, and multi-page layout controls
  • Preflight tools help catch production issues before handoff
  • Strong PDF output for print workflows
  • Integrates well with other Adobe creative applications

Cons

  • Steep learning curve for non-designers
  • Interface can feel complex for simple brochure work
  • Collaboration is less direct than browser-first design tools
Best for
Designers, agencies, print shops, and in-house creative teams producing complex or print-critical brochures
Standout feature
Preflight and professional typography controls
Use cases
Multi-page product brochures and catalogs, Print-ready agency and production work
Visit Adobe InDesign
Affinity logo

7. Affinity

Best desktop design suite for layout, photo, and vector work in one app

Features 8.2 Ease of use 8.0 Value 8.1 Overall 8.1

Affinity gives designers desktop layout, image editing, and vector design in a single creative environment. For brochure work, that means a designer can adjust photos, create vector elements, and assemble layouts without switching between separate tools as often.

It is best for users who want a desktop workflow and more control than browser template tools provide. Some teams moving from older design workflows may need time to adjust to the unified app model.

Pros

  • Combines layout, pixel editing, and vector workspaces
  • Good fit for designers who want desktop control
  • Useful for custom brochure graphics and image-heavy layouts
  • Works well for teams that prefer local design workflows

Cons

  • Some Adobe-level production tools are still missing
  • Unified app model may require adjustment
  • Less friendly for casual non-designers than template-first tools
Best for
Designers who want desktop brochure layout, image editing, and vector illustration in one workspace
Standout feature
Switchable Pixel, Vector, and Layout workspaces
Use cases
Custom designed brochures, Image and vector-heavy marketing materials
Visit Affinity
Piktochart logo

8. Piktochart

Best for informational brochures with charts, maps, and structured visuals

Features 8.0 Ease of use 7.9 Value 7.9 Overall 7.9

Piktochart is well suited to brochures that need to teach, explain, or summarize information. It started from an infographic-first approach, and that shows in its templates, charts, maps, and structured visual blocks.

It is easier to adopt than many desktop tools, especially for educators, HR teams, nonprofits, and internal communicators. Its limits show up when a team needs deep customization or fine chart control.

Pros

  • Infographic-first templates work well for educational brochures
  • Charts and maps are easy to add to structured layouts
  • Good fit for HR, nonprofit, and training content
  • Straightforward editor for non-design teams

Cons

  • Customization is more limited than designer-first tools
  • Chart fine-tuning can feel basic
  • Dense designs may lag
Best for
Educators, HR teams, nonprofits, and communicators making clear informational brochures
Standout feature
Infographic-first brochure creation with charts and maps
Use cases
Training and HR brochures, Nonprofit program explainers
Visit Piktochart
CorelDRAW Graphics Suite logo

9. CorelDRAW Graphics Suite

Best for vector-heavy brochure layouts and print shop workflows

Features 7.8 Ease of use 7.6 Value 7.7 Overall 7.7

CorelDRAW Graphics Suite combines vector illustration, page layout, photo editing, typography, color management, PDF import, and print-focused design tools. It is a strong fit when brochures need custom illustrations, technical graphics, signage assets, or packaging-adjacent visuals.

It is less approachable for casual brochure makers than Canva or Adobe Express. Its best audience is designers, print shops, sign makers, and production teams that already understand vector-based workflows.

Pros

  • Strong vector illustration tools for custom brochure graphics
  • Includes page layout, photo editing, and typography features
  • Color management and PDF tools support print-oriented work
  • Good fit for sign, print, and packaging-adjacent teams

Cons

  • Some users report import issues in certain workflows
  • Stability and performance can vary on complex files
  • Less intuitive for non-designers than browser-based brochure makers
Best for
Print shops, sign makers, packaging teams, and designers building vector-heavy brochures
Standout feature
Integrated vector illustration and page layout in the same design environment
Use cases
Vector-rich product brochures, Print shop brochure and sign collateral
Visit CorelDRAW Graphics Suite
VistaCreate logo

10. VistaCreate

Best for simple brochures tied to social and web graphics

Features 7.6 Ease of use 7.5 Value 7.5 Overall 7.5

VistaCreate is a browser-based design tool with many templates across print, social, and web formats. It works well for small teams that need simple brochures alongside campaign graphics, posts, banners, and other visual materials.

Its brochure workflow is easy to start, with brand kit support, resizing, and common export choices. It is not the strongest option for detailed layout control or complex production work, but it covers straightforward brochure needs well.

Pros

  • Broad template set across brochure, social, web, and print formats
  • Easy editor for quick small-team design work
  • Brand kit support helps keep recurring materials consistent
  • Useful when brochures and social graphics share the same campaign look

Cons

  • Stock asset selection may not satisfy every team
  • Some users report download or sharing issues
  • Limited control for complex brochure systems
Best for
Small teams making simple brochures and matching social graphics from the same design workspace
Standout feature
Broad template set across social, web, and print formats, including brochures
Use cases
Simple promotional brochures, Campaign graphics across print and social formats
Visit VistaCreate

What separated the top brochure makers

The best products did three jobs well. They made it easy to start from a credible brochure template, they kept editing simple for non-designers, and they produced clean exports for print or digital distribution. Canva led because it combines a large brochure template library, drag-and-drop editing, brand assets, comments, and broad export choices in one browser workspace.

Adobe Express finished second because it fits teams already using Adobe assets and workflows. Its PDF import, Adobe Stock access, brand styling, charts, and real-time sharing make it a strong quick-design tool. Visme placed third because it handles brochures that need charts, data visuals, reports, and training content better than most general design tools.

When to choose a specialist instead

Adobe InDesign is the clear specialist for professional print production. It has deeper typography, grids, preflight, multi-page control, and PDF output than browser-first brochure makers. The tradeoff is adoption. InDesign asks for design experience and process discipline.

Marq is the better fit when brand control matters more than open-ended design freedom. Its lockable templates, asset hubs, roles, and smart fields help distributed teams create local brochures without breaking brand rules. Venngage and Piktochart are stronger choices when the brochure is closer to an infographic, explainer, or data handout.

How to match the tool to the team

Choose Canva for broad internal adoption, Adobe Express for Adobe-centered creative teams, Visme for chart-heavy brochures, Venngage for accessibility-aware visual documents, and Marq for distributed brand governance. Choose InDesign, Affinity, or CorelDRAW when designers need desktop layout control and production detail.

The main mistake is choosing only by template count. A large library helps at the start, but export quality, brand controls, collaboration, chart tools, and print handling decide whether the brochure holds up in real work.

What to look for in brochure making software

Start with the brochure formats your team uses most, such as tri-folds, bi-folds, product sheets, event handouts, menus, reports, or sales leave-behinds. The right tool should include templates for those formats, simple page resizing, safe margins, bleed settings when needed, and export options that match both print and digital use.

Also check brand controls. Teams that publish often need logos, colors, fonts, approved images, and reusable layouts in one place. If many people will edit brochures, look for comments, permission controls, shared folders, and template locking.

How brochure making software works

Most browser-based brochure makers start with a template gallery. Users choose a format, replace text and images, adjust colors and fonts, add icons or charts, then export a PDF or image file. Collaboration tools let teammates review copy, swap assets, and leave comments before publishing.

Desktop design tools work differently. Products such as Adobe InDesign, Affinity, and CorelDRAW give designers more control over typography, grids, linked assets, vector shapes, and print production checks. They take more skill, but they are better for complex layouts and strict production requirements.

Common mistakes to avoid

Do not pick a brochure maker only because the first template looks good. Popular templates can make different organizations look too similar, especially when teams do not change structure, imagery, and typography. The best results come from using templates as a starting point, then applying a clear content hierarchy and brand rules.

Another mistake is ignoring export and handoff. A brochure that looks fine in the editor can fail if images are low quality, text is too close to the fold, colors shift, or the PDF lacks the settings a print provider expects. Test exports early, especially for folded brochures and image-heavy layouts.

Who needs brochure making software

Brochure making software is useful for small businesses, schools, nonprofits, healthcare teams, real estate offices, local governments, agencies, event organizers, and internal communications teams. Any group that needs repeatable printed or digital handouts can benefit from a dedicated brochure workflow.

Design teams also use these tools to protect their time. They can build approved templates once, then let other departments update copy, images, locations, dates, and contact details without rebuilding every brochure from scratch.

Conclusion

Canva is the best brochure making software for most teams because it gives non-designers a fast, practical way to create brochures while still supporting brand assets, collaboration, and clean exports.

Adobe Express is the runner-up for teams already working with Adobe assets and quick branded content. Visme is the strongest pick for data-rich brochures, reports, explainers, and education materials. For professional print production, Adobe InDesign remains the specialist choice.

Frequently asked questions

What is brochure making software? +

Brochure making software is a design tool for creating printed or digital brochures, including tri-folds, bi-folds, product sheets, event handouts, menus, and sales materials. It usually includes templates, image tools, text editing, brand assets, and PDF export.

What is the best brochure making software overall? +

Canva is the best brochure making software overall. It has the strongest mix of brochure templates, simple editing, team collaboration, brand assets, and export options for most business, education, and nonprofit teams.

Which brochure maker is best for professional print production? +

Adobe InDesign is best for professional print production. It gives designers detailed control over typography, grids, multi-page layout, preflight checks, and print-focused PDF output.

Which brochure maker is best for data-heavy brochures? +

Visme is best for data-heavy brochures because it includes charts, report-style layouts, visual explainers, and interactive content tools inside the brochure creation workflow.

How did you rank these brochure making tools? +

We ranked the tools by brochure template quality, layout control, ease of editing, collaboration, brand management, chart and visual content support, export quality, and fit for real teams that publish brochures regularly.

Tools reviewed

Related reading

Are you a vendor in this category?

If your product belongs in this comparison, we want to evaluate it. Placement is earned on the research, never bought.

Get your software listed